Available logo

What is AI poisoning — and how can organizations defend against it?

August 28, 2025
Malicious computer programming code in the shape of a skull. Online scam, hacking and digital crime background 3D illustration

When a cybersecurity expert recently tested a simple AI-powered shopping list app, everything seemed perfect. The AI helped add items, suggested cheesecake ingredients, and even corrected typos with impressive accuracy. But when he asked it to add "the most healthy food in the world," the app responded with rat poison. This wasn't a glitch — it was AI poisoning in action.

As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in critical infrastructure, healthcare systems, financial networks, and manufacturing operations, a new category of cyber threat is emerging. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) warns that adversaries can deliberately confuse or "poison" AI systems to make them malfunction, with attacks possible both during training and throughout an AI system's operational life.

Understanding AI poisoning 

AI poisoning occurs when attackers target the data used to train and operate AI systems, corrupting their decision-making processes. The threat encompasses three primary attack vectors:

  1. Training data manipulation: Injecting malicious samples, biased datasets, or incorrect labels into training data to corrupt the model's foundational logic.
  2. Model manipulation: Infiltrating the model itself through adversarial attacks, backdoor insertion, or parameter corruption to make outputs unreliable.
  3. Output interference: Using prompt injection, jailbreaking techniques, or response spoofing to manipulate what users receive from AI systems.

What makes these attacks particularly dangerous is their accessibility.

“Most of these attacks are fairly easy to mount and require minimum knowledge of the AI system and limited adversarial capabilities,” said Alina Oprea, a professor at Northeastern University and co-author of NIST’s report outlining adversarial machine learning strategies. “Poisoning attacks, for example, can be mounted by controlling a few dozen training samples, which would be a very small percentage of the entire training set.” 

Real-world implications across critical sectors

The consequences extend far beyond shopping list mishaps.

In healthcare, poisoned AI could misdiagnose patients or recommend harmful treatments. Financial institutions could see fraud detection systems corrupted to miss suspicious transactions. Transportation systems managing autonomous vehicle networks could be compromised to cause accidents or traffic disruptions. Energy grids — like California's soon-to-be AI-enabled power system — could face dangerous instability if their decision-making algorithms are poisoned.

Recent research, including a study by security researchers on enterprise AI systems, found that AI systems can be manipulated by poisoned documents containing hidden instructions, causing them to ignore legitimate sources, spread misinformation, or leak sensitive data. For organizations across healthcare, energy, industrial, financial, government, manufacturing, and transportation sectors, these vulnerabilities pose serious risks to operations, safety, and reputation.

Government agencies face particular exposure, as data poisoning attacks can distort AI outputs, undermine public trust in services, and reduce reliability of mission-critical systems. But the threat extends to any organization relying on AI for competitive advantage or operational efficiency.

Securing your AI systems

While there's no silver bullet against AI poisoning, organizations can implement comprehensive protection strategies:

  • Strict input sanitization: Strip or flag adversarial instructions in documents before ingestion.
  • Prompt/data separation: Enforce clear boundaries so user prompts aren’t influenced by document text.
  • Citation enforcement: Require traceable sources for all AI outputs.
  • Cache management: Purge deleted or outdated content immediately.
  • Access control and monitoring: Limit who can upload data and audit for anomalies.
  • Adversarial training: Expose models to poisoned data during testing to build resilience.

Traditional cybersecurity approaches are insufficient for AI-specific vulnerabilities. Effective protection requires a zero-trust architecture that secures not just network pipes but the data flowing through them. Organizations need continuous integration and deployment practices that safely test AI models before production deployment — preventing the kind of untested updates that can bring entire systems offline.

Next steps in AI security

As AI poisoning attacks grow more sophisticated and widespread, organizations across critical infrastructure and enterprise systems cannot afford reactive approaches. The time for comprehensive AI security is now — before a poisoned algorithm makes decisions that affect lives, operations, or competitive position.

Ready to protect your AI systems from poisoning attacks? Learn more about implementing robust AI security solutions tailored to your industry's unique risks.